<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 2 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5212</link>
    <description>The court held that the royalties paid by the assessee-company for sole selling agency rights constituted capital expenditure, not revenue expenditure. Consequently, the deductions claimed were disallowed under the Income Tax Act. The court ruled against the assessee, in favor of the revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 2 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5212</link>
      <description>The court held that the royalties paid by the assessee-company for sole selling agency rights constituted capital expenditure, not revenue expenditure. Consequently, the deductions claimed were disallowed under the Income Tax Act. The court ruled against the assessee, in favor of the revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>