https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186677 State laws enhancing the pecuniary and general jurisdiction of civil courts were upheld because, on pith and substance, they fell within administration of justice under the Concurrent List and only incidentally affected Letters Patent appeals and High Court jurisdiction; the challenge based on Entry 78 failed. The Court also treated the notification commencing the Maharashtra measure as capable of deferment where the City Civil Court lacked adequate courtrooms, infrastructure, and minimum judicial strength, and held that immediate operation could validly be kept in abeyance until further orders. The Madhya Pradesh appeals were allowed and the writ petitions there dismissed. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2024 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186677 State laws enhancing the pecuniary and general jurisdiction of civil courts were upheld because, on pith and substance, they fell within administration of justice under the Concurrent List and only incidentally affected Letters Patent appeals and High Court jurisdiction; the challenge based on Entry 78 failed. The Court also treated the notification commencing the Maharashtra measure as capable of deferment where the City Civil Court lacked adequate courtrooms, infrastructure, and minimum judicial strength, and held that immediate operation could validly be kept in abeyance until further orders. The Madhya Pradesh appeals were allowed and the writ petitions there dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186677