<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1092 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332831</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC is limited to discovery of new and important matter or evidence, or to an error apparent on the face of the record; it cannot be used as an appeal in disguise or to reargue issues already decided. The grounds raised had already been considered in the earlier judgment, and no new material or patent error was shown. Liberty granted by the Supreme Court to seek review did not expand the settled scope of review. No ground for review was made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1092 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332831</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC is limited to discovery of new and important matter or evidence, or to an error apparent on the face of the record; it cannot be used as an appeal in disguise or to reargue issues already decided. The grounds raised had already been considered in the earlier judgment, and no new material or patent error was shown. Liberty granted by the Supreme Court to seek review did not expand the settled scope of review. No ground for review was made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>