<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1090 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332829</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, adjusting the deposit amount for provisional release to Rs. 15 lakhs instead of the entire differential duty, while maintaining other conditions. The Court emphasized the necessity of prompt adjudication and instructed the adjudicating officer to expedite the hearing and issue final orders swiftly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1090 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332829</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, adjusting the deposit amount for provisional release to Rs. 15 lakhs instead of the entire differential duty, while maintaining other conditions. The Court emphasized the necessity of prompt adjudication and instructed the adjudicating officer to expedite the hearing and issue final orders swiftly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>