https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332827 The Court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to calculate the accurate refund amount, considering TR-6 challans and penalty adjustments, and ensure timely repayment to the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the legitimate recovery of the differential duty, the petitioner's concession regarding the penalty, and the importance of following due process for refund processing. The respondents were instructed to process the refund, adjusting the differential duty and penalty, and repay the balance with interest within three weeks, discharging bank guarantees as well. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:30:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332827 The Court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to calculate the accurate refund amount, considering TR-6 challans and penalty adjustments, and ensure timely repayment to the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the legitimate recovery of the differential duty, the petitioner's concession regarding the penalty, and the importance of following due process for refund processing. The respondents were instructed to process the refund, adjusting the differential duty and penalty, and repay the balance with interest within three weeks, discharging bank guarantees as well. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332827