<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1084 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332823</link>
    <description>Tax liability under the TNVAT framework in works-contract cases must rest on a proper factual inquiry into the stage of construction, flats sold or unsold, and the basis for valuing deemed sale of goods; because the record was incomplete, the assessment on this issue was set aside and remanded. Input tax credit reversal on cross-verification mismatch requires proof of purchases, payment details, and reconciliation with seller returns; as the factual foundation was not fully verified, that assessment was also remanded. Deletion of assets in the balance sheet cannot by itself sustain tax on sale of fixed assets without examining the supporting documents and actual nature of the transaction; this issue too was sent back for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1084 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332823</link>
      <description>Tax liability under the TNVAT framework in works-contract cases must rest on a proper factual inquiry into the stage of construction, flats sold or unsold, and the basis for valuing deemed sale of goods; because the record was incomplete, the assessment on this issue was set aside and remanded. Input tax credit reversal on cross-verification mismatch requires proof of purchases, payment details, and reconciliation with seller returns; as the factual foundation was not fully verified, that assessment was also remanded. Deletion of assets in the balance sheet cannot by itself sustain tax on sale of fixed assets without examining the supporting documents and actual nature of the transaction; this issue too was sent back for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>