<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5208</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the provisions of section 153(3)(ii) were not applicable in the case due to the lack of valid findings and directions by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The case was remanded to the High Court for an opinion on the applicability of section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and ensuring proper assessments based on valid findings and directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5208</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the provisions of section 153(3)(ii) were not applicable in the case due to the lack of valid findings and directions by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The case was remanded to the High Court for an opinion on the applicability of section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and ensuring proper assessments based on valid findings and directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>