<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1067 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332806</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the disallowance of the 10A deduction claim did not constitute deliberate concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The ITAT emphasized that the claim was made in good faith based on statutory provisions and previous eligibility, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1067 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332806</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the disallowance of the 10A deduction claim did not constitute deliberate concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The ITAT emphasized that the claim was made in good faith based on statutory provisions and previous eligibility, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>