<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 485 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186662</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that once parties reach a full and final settlement, the Arbitration clause cannot be invoked unilaterally. Emphasizing the sanctity of contracts and settlements, the Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that the respondent could not invoke Arbitration post-settlement, as no arbitrable dispute remained after the settlement agreement was reached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 485 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186662</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that once parties reach a full and final settlement, the Arbitration clause cannot be invoked unilaterally. Emphasizing the sanctity of contracts and settlements, the Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that the respondent could not invoke Arbitration post-settlement, as no arbitrable dispute remained after the settlement agreement was reached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>