<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1265 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186659</link>
    <description>The Court held that the assessee is entitled to the normal rate of depreciation at 25% on vehicles leased to AMC, not the higher rate of 40%. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the higher depreciation was reversed, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial precedents and consistency in Revenue matters, highlighting that each assessment year creates a new cause of action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1265 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186659</link>
      <description>The Court held that the assessee is entitled to the normal rate of depreciation at 25% on vehicles leased to AMC, not the higher rate of 40%. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the higher depreciation was reversed, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial precedents and consistency in Revenue matters, highlighting that each assessment year creates a new cause of action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>