<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1100 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186652</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of remuneration paid to a partner working in a partnership firm in HUF capacity. The Tribunal held that remuneration can be paid to a partner representing their HUF, as the profits would go to the HUF in such cases. The decision was based on precedents allowing remuneration to partners representing HUF, emphasizing that remuneration to partners in their individual capacity, even if representing HUF, is an allowable deduction under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:08:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1100 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186652</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of remuneration paid to a partner working in a partnership firm in HUF capacity. The Tribunal held that remuneration can be paid to a partner representing their HUF, as the profits would go to the HUF in such cases. The decision was based on precedents allowing remuneration to partners representing HUF, emphasizing that remuneration to partners in their individual capacity, even if representing HUF, is an allowable deduction under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>