<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 662 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186649</link>
    <description>An Additional Commissioner of Income-tax was held capable of exercising the powers and functions of an Assessing Officer for assessment purposes, notwithstanding that the term &quot;Additional Commissioner&quot; did not appear in section 2(7A). The court followed its earlier view in a connected matter and answered the legal issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Because the Tribunal had not examined the controversy on merits, the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration and decision on the substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 662 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186649</link>
      <description>An Additional Commissioner of Income-tax was held capable of exercising the powers and functions of an Assessing Officer for assessment purposes, notwithstanding that the term &quot;Additional Commissioner&quot; did not appear in section 2(7A). The court followed its earlier view in a connected matter and answered the legal issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Because the Tribunal had not examined the controversy on merits, the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration and decision on the substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>