<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1057 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332796</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal found that the rejection of a portion of the refund claim amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 1,80,290/- by the lower authorities was unjustified. The tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider this specific claim on its merits, treating it as filed within the time limit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1057 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332796</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal found that the rejection of a portion of the refund claim amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 1,80,290/- by the lower authorities was unjustified. The tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider this specific claim on its merits, treating it as filed within the time limit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>