https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332795 Contemporaneous physical evidence, including cartons, rubber stamps and inquiry statements, was treated as sufficient to support misdeclaration of Maximum Retail Price on gas stoves and resultant duty evasion. The plea that no finished goods were seized, or that the goods were not found in cartons, was rejected because the cartons and stamps themselves indicated the declared MRP and the maintenance of different MRP markings for the same goods. The demand and related proceedings were therefore sustained, and the challenge failed. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332795 Contemporaneous physical evidence, including cartons, rubber stamps and inquiry statements, was treated as sufficient to support misdeclaration of Maximum Retail Price on gas stoves and resultant duty evasion. The plea that no finished goods were seized, or that the goods were not found in cartons, was rejected because the cartons and stamps themselves indicated the declared MRP and the maintenance of different MRP markings for the same goods. The demand and related proceedings were therefore sustained, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332795