<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1054 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332793</link>
    <description>Refunds arising from finalisation of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not be denied on unjust enrichment for claims filed before the 1999 amendment inserting that bar. The governing law for the relevant period did not permit rejection of such refund claims on that ground. Credit reversal directed in relation to inputs used for intermediate goods was also unsustainable where those intermediate goods were consumed in the manufacture of the final excisable product and the factual findings favoured the assessee. The refund was left intact and the reversal direction was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1054 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332793</link>
      <description>Refunds arising from finalisation of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not be denied on unjust enrichment for claims filed before the 1999 amendment inserting that bar. The governing law for the relevant period did not permit rejection of such refund claims on that ground. Credit reversal directed in relation to inputs used for intermediate goods was also unsustainable where those intermediate goods were consumed in the manufacture of the final excisable product and the factual findings favoured the assessee. The refund was left intact and the reversal direction was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>