<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1053 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332792</link>
    <description>The case involved the distribution of inadmissible cenvat credit from a tax-exempt unit to another unit. The appellant mistakenly distributed ineligible credit, claiming it was a bonafide error. However, the Department found the credit was utilized before a voluntary payment was made post-intervention. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition, emphasizing the importance of proactive compliance with tax regulations and accountability for errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1053 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332792</link>
      <description>The case involved the distribution of inadmissible cenvat credit from a tax-exempt unit to another unit. The appellant mistakenly distributed ineligible credit, claiming it was a bonafide error. However, the Department found the credit was utilized before a voluntary payment was made post-intervention. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition, emphasizing the importance of proactive compliance with tax regulations and accountability for errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>