<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1051 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for denial of Cenvat credit due to the failure to allow cross-examination, noting a miscarriage of justice. It found no collusion or fraudulent intent on the appellant&#039;s part and upheld the reversal of the credit amount. The appellant was granted partial relief, with the penalty being overturned, but they were not entitled to re-credit the reversed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1051 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for denial of Cenvat credit due to the failure to allow cross-examination, noting a miscarriage of justice. It found no collusion or fraudulent intent on the appellant&#039;s part and upheld the reversal of the credit amount. The appellant was granted partial relief, with the penalty being overturned, but they were not entitled to re-credit the reversed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>