<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1047 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332786</link>
    <description>HC held that a bona fide, permanent change in stock valuation from lowest price during the year to weighted average cost was permissible, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary finding was without merit, decision against Revenue. Separately, packing expenses for exported goods did not qualify for deduction under section 35B(1)(b) of the Act, and that issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1047 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332786</link>
      <description>HC held that a bona fide, permanent change in stock valuation from lowest price during the year to weighted average cost was permissible, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary finding was without merit, decision against Revenue. Separately, packing expenses for exported goods did not qualify for deduction under section 35B(1)(b) of the Act, and that issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>