<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1045 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263 as it was found to be legally flawed and unsustainable. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, who was deemed eligible for additional depreciation on the windmill under Section 32(1)(iia). The issue of deduction under Section 10A was not addressed further due to the primary ruling on jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1045 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263 as it was found to be legally flawed and unsustainable. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, who was deemed eligible for additional depreciation on the windmill under Section 32(1)(iia). The issue of deduction under Section 10A was not addressed further due to the primary ruling on jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>