<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1044 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of trade credits, justifying the application of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Despite subsequent payments made by the assessee, the Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for further examination of evidence to determine the authenticity of the transactions. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1044 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of trade credits, justifying the application of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Despite subsequent payments made by the assessee, the Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for further examination of evidence to determine the authenticity of the transactions. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>