https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186643 Section 91 of the Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act required proof of pakka tenancy and dispossession otherwise than in due course of law, so the enquiry extended to title and was not a purely summary remedy like Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. A dispossessed pakka tenant had to first pursue the statutory remedy before the revenue authority; a civil suit for possession was not maintainable at the outset without doing so. Filing the Section 91 application also interrupted adverse possession for limitation purposes, so the possession claim was not barred. en-us Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186643 Section 91 of the Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act required proof of pakka tenancy and dispossession otherwise than in due course of law, so the enquiry extended to title and was not a purely summary remedy like Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. A dispossessed pakka tenant had to first pursue the statutory remedy before the revenue authority; a civil suit for possession was not maintainable at the outset without doing so. Filing the Section 91 application also interrupted adverse possession for limitation purposes, so the possession claim was not barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186643