https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186639 Section 417(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code was treated as a special limitation rule for leave to appeal from acquittal, and the time needed to obtain a certified copy was excluded under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act; the application was therefore within time. The High Court's reversal of acquittal was upheld because the injured witness and an independent witness were found reliable, and the plea of private defence of property failed since the accused could have sought lawful recourse instead of taking the law into his own hands. Probationary relief under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 was denied for want of proof that the appellant was below twenty-one years of age. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:47:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186639 Section 417(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code was treated as a special limitation rule for leave to appeal from acquittal, and the time needed to obtain a certified copy was excluded under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act; the application was therefore within time. The High Court's reversal of acquittal was upheld because the injured witness and an independent witness were found reliable, and the plea of private defence of property failed since the accused could have sought lawful recourse instead of taking the law into his own hands. Probationary relief under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 was denied for want of proof that the appellant was below twenty-one years of age. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186639