<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1423 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186624</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of addition of profit on sale of shares as business profit was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the tax effect being below the threshold set by C.B.D.T. Instruction No.5 of 2008. The disallowance of interest payment to creditors was upheld as the assessee failed to deduct tax at source, under section 40(a)(ia). The disallowance of interest paid to the bank was confirmed as only a portion of the bank loan was used for business purposes. Additionally, the disallowance of telephone and vehicle expenses was upheld due to personal use elements. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1423 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186624</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of addition of profit on sale of shares as business profit was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the tax effect being below the threshold set by C.B.D.T. Instruction No.5 of 2008. The disallowance of interest payment to creditors was upheld as the assessee failed to deduct tax at source, under section 40(a)(ia). The disallowance of interest paid to the bank was confirmed as only a portion of the bank loan was used for business purposes. Additionally, the disallowance of telephone and vehicle expenses was upheld due to personal use elements. Both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>