<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1028 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332767</link>
    <description>The court considered a request to recall its order and conduct a fresh auction for an aircraft due to discrepancies in bid acceptance and actions by the Service Tax Commissioner. The highest bid was significantly lower than the reserve price, leading to the bid acceptance limit issue. Delay in confirming the sale affected the balance amount deposit by the highest bidder, who requested more time. The court highlighted the Commissioner&#039;s actions and allowed the bidder to be a party respondent. The court emphasized that any decision on the order recall would involve further directions and risks for the parties involved in the sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1028 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332767</link>
      <description>The court considered a request to recall its order and conduct a fresh auction for an aircraft due to discrepancies in bid acceptance and actions by the Service Tax Commissioner. The highest bid was significantly lower than the reserve price, leading to the bid acceptance limit issue. Delay in confirming the sale affected the balance amount deposit by the highest bidder, who requested more time. The court highlighted the Commissioner&#039;s actions and allowed the bidder to be a party respondent. The court emphasized that any decision on the order recall would involve further directions and risks for the parties involved in the sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>