<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1027 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332766</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by a private limited company challenging a common order passed by the respondent under the Finance Act. The Court emphasized the importance of following the statutory appellate process provided by the Act and rejected the petitioner&#039;s attempt to bypass the appellate remedy available at CESTAT. The judgment highlighted that factual issues should be addressed through the prescribed statutory remedies rather than through Writ Petitions, advising the petitioner to pursue remedies as per the provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1027 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332766</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by a private limited company challenging a common order passed by the respondent under the Finance Act. The Court emphasized the importance of following the statutory appellate process provided by the Act and rejected the petitioner&#039;s attempt to bypass the appellate remedy available at CESTAT. The judgment highlighted that factual issues should be addressed through the prescribed statutory remedies rather than through Writ Petitions, advising the petitioner to pursue remedies as per the provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>