https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332760 The court upheld the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for failing to produce proof for two ARE-1s. The appellant's argument regarding compliance with four transactions and lack of evidence for the remaining two was rejected. The court found no breach of natural justice principles in not furnishing seized documents and dismissed the appeal, as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332760 The court upheld the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for failing to produce proof for two ARE-1s. The appellant's argument regarding compliance with four transactions and lack of evidence for the remaining two was rejected. The court found no breach of natural justice principles in not furnishing seized documents and dismissed the appeal, as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332760