<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1017 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the relevant date for refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944 is the payment of duty, not the sale time from depots. Emphasizing a literal interpretation of tax statutes, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims, dismissing the appeals due to lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1017 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the relevant date for refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944 is the payment of duty, not the sale time from depots. Emphasizing a literal interpretation of tax statutes, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims, dismissing the appeals due to lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>