<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1012 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the Appeal before the Tribunal, which was delayed by approximately 332 days. The Appellant&#039;s explanation for the delay was deemed vague and unsubstantiated, leading to a finding of negligence on their part. Citing a judgment of the Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that the delay lacked merit and subsequently dismissed the Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1012 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the Appeal before the Tribunal, which was delayed by approximately 332 days. The Appellant&#039;s explanation for the delay was deemed vague and unsubstantiated, leading to a finding of negligence on their part. Citing a judgment of the Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that the delay lacked merit and subsequently dismissed the Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>