<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1010 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found errors in the impugned order regarding the valuation of an imported Mercedes Benz Car with accessories for Customs duty determination. The lower authorities had added an additional amount for accessories despite the purchase price covering all costs, as confirmed by the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. As the invoice did not specify a separate amount for accessories, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1010 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found errors in the impugned order regarding the valuation of an imported Mercedes Benz Car with accessories for Customs duty determination. The lower authorities had added an additional amount for accessories despite the purchase price covering all costs, as confirmed by the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. As the invoice did not specify a separate amount for accessories, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>