https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332747 A review petition was held not maintainable where the proper challenge was to the earlier judgment that had directed the clarification authority to decide the matter and had kept assessment proceedings in abeyance. The Court noted that, if assessment orders had already been served, the party should have sought review of that earlier order rather than file later review applications after consequential proceedings had already followed. In these circumstances, the later review petitions could not be entertained and were dismissed, leaving the earlier directions undisturbed. en-us Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:26:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332747 A review petition was held not maintainable where the proper challenge was to the earlier judgment that had directed the clarification authority to decide the matter and had kept assessment proceedings in abeyance. The Court noted that, if assessment orders had already been served, the party should have sought review of that earlier order rather than file later review applications after consequential proceedings had already followed. In these circumstances, the later review petitions could not be entertained and were dismissed, leaving the earlier directions undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332747