<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1005 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 68.45 lakhs on account of unsecured loans from sister concerns under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal found the assessee had sufficiently proven the genuineness of the transactions, even in the absence of certain records destroyed due to floods. The decision emphasizes the importance of providing alternative evidence to substantiate transactions when original records are unavailable, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1005 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 68.45 lakhs on account of unsecured loans from sister concerns under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal found the assessee had sufficiently proven the genuineness of the transactions, even in the absence of certain records destroyed due to floods. The decision emphasizes the importance of providing alternative evidence to substantiate transactions when original records are unavailable, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>