<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 995 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held that the cash payments made were genuine and essential for business operations, thus not warranting disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of preventing tax evasion while recognizing genuine transactions. The final order was pronounced on 12/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 995 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held that the cash payments made were genuine and essential for business operations, thus not warranting disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of preventing tax evasion while recognizing genuine transactions. The final order was pronounced on 12/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>