<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 992 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the disallowance of the deduction under section 80IB(10) for late filing was beyond the scope of adjustments under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2012-13, emphasizing that the deduction should not be denied solely due to filing beyond the initial deadline but within the extended period allowed under section 139(4).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 992 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the disallowance of the deduction under section 80IB(10) for late filing was beyond the scope of adjustments under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2012-13, emphasizing that the deduction should not be denied solely due to filing beyond the initial deadline but within the extended period allowed under section 139(4).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>