<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST threshold fixed at 20 lakh in GST council&#039;s meet, rate to be decided in October</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=16652</link>
    <description>Agreement establishes a GST exemption threshold with lower differentiated limits for north-eastern and hill states, narrows the exemption list, and subsumes all cesses into GST. States will exercise exclusive administrative control over dealers up to a specified turnover ceiling; a mechanism will allocate regulatory responsibility for larger dealers to either the Centre or a state to avoid dual control. The Centre will retain control over existing service tax registrants. Broad principles for compensating states for transitional revenue impact were discussed and a base year for revenue comparison was indicated, with further methodology and rate-setting deferred to future meetings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 07:15:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 07:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST threshold fixed at 20 lakh in GST council&#039;s meet, rate to be decided in October</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=16652</link>
      <description>Agreement establishes a GST exemption threshold with lower differentiated limits for north-eastern and hill states, narrows the exemption list, and subsumes all cesses into GST. States will exercise exclusive administrative control over dealers up to a specified turnover ceiling; a mechanism will allocate regulatory responsibility for larger dealers to either the Centre or a state to avoid dual control. The Centre will retain control over existing service tax registrants. Broad principles for compensating states for transitional revenue impact were discussed and a base year for revenue comparison was indicated, with further methodology and rate-setting deferred to future meetings.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 07:15:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=16652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>