<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 999 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186608</link>
    <description>The ITAT adjudicated multiple issues, dismissing the taxation of Rs. 3,35,11,413 under Section 41(1) as not pressed. Various expense disallowances were either confirmed or remanded for further verification. The Tribunal allowed the deduction for exchange fluctuation and partially allowed agricultural expenses. Additions under Section 145A were upheld with adjustments for stock valuation. Computation of book profit under Section 115JB was clarified, allowing a deduction of Rs. 1,39,72,192 under Section 80HHC, and confirming the applicability of Sections 234B and 234C for interest on advance tax defaults. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 999 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186608</link>
      <description>The ITAT adjudicated multiple issues, dismissing the taxation of Rs. 3,35,11,413 under Section 41(1) as not pressed. Various expense disallowances were either confirmed or remanded for further verification. The Tribunal allowed the deduction for exchange fluctuation and partially allowed agricultural expenses. Additions under Section 145A were upheld with adjustments for stock valuation. Computation of book profit under Section 115JB was clarified, allowing a deduction of Rs. 1,39,72,192 under Section 80HHC, and confirming the applicability of Sections 234B and 234C for interest on advance tax defaults. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>