<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1195 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow director&#039;s remuneration under section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found the increase in director&#039;s remuneration justified based on the significant increase in turnover and net profit, attributing it to the directors&#039; qualifications and efforts. It emphasized the necessity of establishing the fair market value of services before disallowing under section 40A(2) and noted that the reduction in other employees&#039; salaries was not indicative of excessive director&#039;s remuneration. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the entire director&#039;s remuneration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:55:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1195 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow director&#039;s remuneration under section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found the increase in director&#039;s remuneration justified based on the significant increase in turnover and net profit, attributing it to the directors&#039; qualifications and efforts. It emphasized the necessity of establishing the fair market value of services before disallowing under section 40A(2) and noted that the reduction in other employees&#039; salaries was not indicative of excessive director&#039;s remuneration. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the entire director&#039;s remuneration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>