<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1072 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186602</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CESTAT order, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 35-G of the Act. The Court highlighted the importance of following the statutory appeal process when available, noting that such power should be sparingly exercised in the absence of strong reasons to ignore the statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1072 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186602</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CESTAT order, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 35-G of the Act. The Court highlighted the importance of following the statutory appeal process when available, noting that such power should be sparingly exercised in the absence of strong reasons to ignore the statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>