<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 178 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186598</link>
    <description>Termination of a workman on expiry of a fixed-term temporary appointment is treated as retrenchment where the Industrial Disputes Act&#039;s express exclusions do not apply. The text states that retrenchment has wide amplitude and that the substance of the employment arrangement, not the form of the appointment order, is decisive. It further states that compliance with the retrenchment compensation requirement is a condition precedent under Section 25F, so non-payment renders the termination invalid and inoperative. On the facts described, the termination was therefore treated as unlawful and reinstatement followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 178 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186598</link>
      <description>Termination of a workman on expiry of a fixed-term temporary appointment is treated as retrenchment where the Industrial Disputes Act&#039;s express exclusions do not apply. The text states that retrenchment has wide amplitude and that the substance of the employment arrangement, not the form of the appointment order, is decisive. It further states that compliance with the retrenchment compensation requirement is a condition precedent under Section 25F, so non-payment renders the termination invalid and inoperative. On the facts described, the termination was therefore treated as unlawful and reinstatement followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>