<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 988 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside conflicting orders of the Commissioners (Appeals) in appeals concerning Cenvat credit on input services for IT software export. The case involved discrepancies in orders and the need for a unified approach to cross appeals. Both orders were remanded for joint disposal to ensure coherence and compliance with the law. The appellant was directed to appear for a hearing, and the remand order was set aside. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed for a fresh consideration by the Commissioners (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 988 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside conflicting orders of the Commissioners (Appeals) in appeals concerning Cenvat credit on input services for IT software export. The case involved discrepancies in orders and the need for a unified approach to cross appeals. Both orders were remanded for joint disposal to ensure coherence and compliance with the law. The appellant was directed to appear for a hearing, and the remand order was set aside. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed for a fresh consideration by the Commissioners (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>