https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332725 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the services provided qualified as export of services under Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules, 2005. The appellant was found not liable to pay service tax in India as the services were considered exported. The extended period for demand was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of suppression of facts. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law. en-us Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332725 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the services provided qualified as export of services under Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules, 2005. The appellant was found not liable to pay service tax in India as the services were considered exported. The extended period for demand was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of suppression of facts. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332725