https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332722 The High Court of Calcutta addressed a challenge to an Order under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 regarding a rebate claim for goods exported to Bangladesh. The petitioner, a merchant exporter, faced discrepancies in treatment of issues by the revisional authority. Despite procedural lapses, the High Court set aside the impugned order, directing compliance with directions from the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Kolkata. The writ petition was allowed, emphasizing the necessity for consistent treatment of issues and clear justifications for rejecting rebate claims due to procedural lapses. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Apr 2017 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332722 The High Court of Calcutta addressed a challenge to an Order under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 regarding a rebate claim for goods exported to Bangladesh. The petitioner, a merchant exporter, faced discrepancies in treatment of issues by the revisional authority. Despite procedural lapses, the High Court set aside the impugned order, directing compliance with directions from the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Kolkata. The writ petition was allowed, emphasizing the necessity for consistent treatment of issues and clear justifications for rejecting rebate claims due to procedural lapses. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332722