https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332718 The High Court held that the writ petition challenging orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was not maintainable as the remedy of appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was available. The petitioner withdrew the writ petition to pursue the statutory appeal, which was granted by the court. The court ordered the return of documents and provided a certified copy of the order to the petitioner's counsel. The judgment emphasizes adherence to legal procedures and remedies, resulting in the disposal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332718 The High Court held that the writ petition challenging orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was not maintainable as the remedy of appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was available. The petitioner withdrew the writ petition to pursue the statutory appeal, which was granted by the court. The court ordered the return of documents and provided a certified copy of the order to the petitioner's counsel. The judgment emphasizes adherence to legal procedures and remedies, resulting in the disposal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332718