<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 978 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal to the extent of granting the Appellant the option of a reduced penalty under Section 11AC, provided it is paid along with the duty and interest demanded within one month from the receipt of the order. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of duty and interest due to shortages of TMT bars during stock verification, as the Appellant admitted the shortages but failed to provide adequate explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 978 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal to the extent of granting the Appellant the option of a reduced penalty under Section 11AC, provided it is paid along with the duty and interest demanded within one month from the receipt of the order. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of duty and interest due to shortages of TMT bars during stock verification, as the Appellant admitted the shortages but failed to provide adequate explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>