<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 972 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332711</link>
    <description>A statutory first charge for recovery of public revenue under the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 was treated as prevailing over a mortgagee&#039;s and secured creditor&#039;s rights under SARFAESI. The analysis applies the principle that non obstante clauses in recovery statutes do not displace a State law that expressly creates priority over property, so land, buildings and their products remain security for public revenue. On that basis, the revenue dues ranked ahead of the bank&#039;s claim, and the secured creditor could recover only from any balance remaining after satisfaction of the State&#039;s dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 972 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332711</link>
      <description>A statutory first charge for recovery of public revenue under the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 was treated as prevailing over a mortgagee&#039;s and secured creditor&#039;s rights under SARFAESI. The analysis applies the principle that non obstante clauses in recovery statutes do not displace a State law that expressly creates priority over property, so land, buildings and their products remain security for public revenue. On that basis, the revenue dues ranked ahead of the bank&#039;s claim, and the secured creditor could recover only from any balance remaining after satisfaction of the State&#039;s dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>