<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 969 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332708</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2010, the designated authority must verify the application, payment details and statutory conditions before rejecting a settlement claim; rejection is not justified on an incorrect assumption that arrears were not pending when the scheme commenced. Where appellate orders had modified the assessment and revised assessment orders had not yet been passed, the assessee could not be faulted for that omission, and the authority had to examine the complete records or require revised orders before deciding the application on merits. The rejection orders were quashed and the applications were remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 969 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332708</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2010, the designated authority must verify the application, payment details and statutory conditions before rejecting a settlement claim; rejection is not justified on an incorrect assumption that arrears were not pending when the scheme commenced. Where appellate orders had modified the assessment and revised assessment orders had not yet been passed, the assessee could not be faulted for that omission, and the authority had to examine the complete records or require revised orders before deciding the application on merits. The rejection orders were quashed and the applications were remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>