<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 961 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld the assessment of the annual value of the property based on fair rental value, rejecting the claim for vacancy remission due to intended letting. The decision aligns with judicial precedents emphasizing actual letting as necessary for claiming vacancy remission under section 23(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 961 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld the assessment of the annual value of the property based on fair rental value, rejecting the claim for vacancy remission due to intended letting. The decision aligns with judicial precedents emphasizing actual letting as necessary for claiming vacancy remission under section 23(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>