<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 520 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186583</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court noted that the issue in the revenue&#039;s civil appeal had already been covered against the Revenue and, on that concession, dismissed the appeal. The operative point is that no further contest remained on the issue raised, so the court did not disturb the existing legal position applied against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 520 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186583</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court noted that the issue in the revenue&#039;s civil appeal had already been covered against the Revenue and, on that concession, dismissed the appeal. The operative point is that no further contest remained on the issue raised, so the court did not disturb the existing legal position applied against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>