<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1035 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186567</link>
    <description>Royalties and licence fees paid for importing beta/digibeta film tapes were examined for inclusion in customs assessable value, with the key question being whether the payments related only to reproduction rights or to a wider bundle of exploitation rights, and whether they were a condition of supply payable before import. The panel also considered whether non-disclosure of such payments constituted suppression justifying the extended limitation period, confiscation and penalties. The Members recorded a difference of opinion and referred the matter to a Third Member, so no final determination was made on valuation, limitation, confiscation or penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1035 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186567</link>
      <description>Royalties and licence fees paid for importing beta/digibeta film tapes were examined for inclusion in customs assessable value, with the key question being whether the payments related only to reproduction rights or to a wider bundle of exploitation rights, and whether they were a condition of supply payable before import. The panel also considered whether non-disclosure of such payments constituted suppression justifying the extended limitation period, confiscation and penalties. The Members recorded a difference of opinion and referred the matter to a Third Member, so no final determination was made on valuation, limitation, confiscation or penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>