<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 76 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5169</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the question to the Constitution Bench for clarification on the retrospective operation of an amended statute. It was affirmed that the issue had been consistently decided in the affirmative, with no conflicting decisions necessitating resolution. The case was referred back to the Division Bench for additional review on the substantive aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 76 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5169</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the question to the Constitution Bench for clarification on the retrospective operation of an amended statute. It was affirmed that the issue had been consistently decided in the affirmative, with no conflicting decisions necessitating resolution. The case was referred back to the Division Bench for additional review on the substantive aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>