<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5160</link>
    <description>An order under section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 directing payment of additional supertax was held not to be an assessment order. As a result, the limitation period in section 34(3), which applies only to assessment orders, could not bar the section 23A order even though it was made more than four years after the assessment year ended. The Supreme Court accordingly held that the order was not time-barred and the Revenue&#039;s position prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5160</link>
      <description>An order under section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 directing payment of additional supertax was held not to be an assessment order. As a result, the limitation period in section 34(3), which applies only to assessment orders, could not bar the section 23A order even though it was made more than four years after the assessment year ended. The Supreme Court accordingly held that the order was not time-barred and the Revenue&#039;s position prevailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>